Audit
- Full profile read
- Competitor gap list
- Anchor distribution map
- Written recommendations
- No placement commitment
Editorial link building for teams that check the placement before they pay for it.
Link building has a reputation problem, and mostly it earns it. The industry rewards speed, and speed rewards shortcuts. We took the opposite position: a slower pipeline, a smaller monthly ceiling, and a review step that occasionally kills a placement we have already paid for. It costs us margin and it keeps the results defensible.
No, and you should be wary of anyone who does. We can guarantee where a link is placed, that it is live, and that we will keep checking it. What a search engine does with that is outside anybody's control.
By default yes, and the report states the attribute for every placement. A natural profile contains a mix, so we do not treat a nofollow from a strong publisher as a failure.
We do, to the publisher's brief. If you would rather supply drafts, we will edit them to the publisher's standard before submission.
By placement, on the publisher, agreed before we start. There is no bulk discount for volume because volume is not what we are selling.
The team is distributed across Europe, which is mostly why the outreach in Polish, Ukrainian, German and Spanish is done by people who actually speak those languages.
A profile audit on its own is worthwhile and plenty of people stop there. For placements, anything under a few months tends not to tell you much either way.
We would rather cover six niches properly than claim forty. If your sector is not one we know, we will say so rather than improvise with a general-interest blog.
Alongside new placements, each report lists everything we re-checked from previous cycles and its current state. Links that disappeared appear in the report as clearly as links that went live.
Nothing in the report is a score we invented. Where we quote a third-party metric we name the tool and the date it was pulled, because those numbers move and a figure without a date is decoration.
If a placement did not happen, the report says which one and why. Campaigns that only ever report successes are hiding the interesting part.
Reports are written on the assumption that somebody sceptical will read them. Every placement carries the live URL, the anchor used, the target page, the publication date and a short note explaining why that publisher was on the list in the first place.
We keep a separate project going where the working notes and the longer write-ups live. It is less polished and rather more detailed:
There is no sales sequence at the end of this. You write, we reply, and if it is not a fit we will usually be able to point you somewhere better.